Re: [patch] vmscan: initialize sc.order in indirect shrink_list()users

From: Andrew Morton
Date: Tue Feb 10 2009 - 19:49:13 EST


On Tue, 10 Feb 2009 17:51:35 +0100
Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> shrink_all_memory() and __zone_reclaim() currently don't initialize
> the .order field of their scan control.
>
> Both of them call into functions which use that field and make certain
> decisions based on a random value.
>
> The functions depending on the .order field are marked with a star,
> the faulty entry points are marked with a percentage sign:
>
> * shrink_page_list()
> * shrink_inactive_list()
> * shrink_active_list()
> shrink_list()
> shrink_all_zones()
> % shrink_all_memory()
> shrink_zone()
> % __zone_reclaim()
>
> Initialize .order to zero in shrink_all_memory(). Initialize .order
> to the order parameter in __zone_reclaim().
>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 2 ++
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 4422301..9ce85ea 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -2112,6 +2112,7 @@ unsigned long shrink_all_memory(unsigned long nr_pages)
> .may_unmap = 0,
> .swap_cluster_max = nr_pages,
> .may_writepage = 1,
> + .order = 0,
> .isolate_pages = isolate_pages_global,
> };
>
> @@ -2294,6 +2295,7 @@ static int __zone_reclaim(struct zone *zone, gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order)
> SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX),
> .gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
> .swappiness = vm_swappiness,
> + .order = order,
> .isolate_pages = isolate_pages_global,
> };
> unsigned long slab_reclaimable;

The second hunk might fix something, but it would need a correcter
changelog, and some thought about what its runtimes effects are likely
to be, please.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/