Re: [PATCH, for 2.6.29] ptrace: fix the usage of ptrace_fork()

From: Markus Metzger
Date: Tue Feb 10 2009 - 16:00:37 EST


On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 21:21 +0100, Markus Metzger wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-02-10 at 19:40 +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:

> > Perhaps, for 2.6.29, we can do something like the "patch" below?
> >
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c
> > @@ -810,11 +810,15 @@ static void ptrace_bts_untrace(struct ta
> >
> > static void ptrace_bts_detach(struct task_struct *child)
> > {
> > + // We can race with de_thread/do_wait which
> > + // can do ptrace_bts_untrace() before us
> > if (unlikely(child->bts)) {
> > - ds_release_bts(child->bts);
> > - child->bts = NULL;
> > -
> > - ptrace_bts_free_buffer(child);
> > + // This all will be freed by ptrace_bts_untrace()
> > + // later, but we should update ->mm
> > + down_write(->mmap_sem);
> > + mm->total_vm -= bts_size;
> > + mm->locked_vm -= bts_size);
> > + up_write(->mmap_sem);
> > }
> > }
> > #else
> >
>

There's still a race.
The kfree() is safe, now, but ptrace_bts_untrace() might have cleared
child->bts_size before we can refund the memory.

We need to make ptrace_bts_untrace() ignore child->bts_size and clear
it in ptrace_bts_detach().


regards,
markus.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/