[patch] mm: task dirty accounting fix

From: Nick Piggin
Date: Mon Feb 09 2009 - 23:40:18 EST


Hi,

This is based from an earlier patch from YAMAMOTO-san which I have
somewhat simplified. What do you think?

Thanks,
Nick

--
YAMAMOTO-san noticed that task_dirty_inc doesn't seem to be called properly for
cases where set_page_dirty is not used to dirty a page (eg. mark_buffer_dirty).

Additionally, there is some inconsistency about when task_dirty_inc is
called. It is used for dirty balancing, however it even gets called for
__set_page_dirty_no_writeback.

So rather than increment it in a set_page_dirty wrapper, move it down to
exactly where the dirty page accounting stats are incremented.

Cc: YAMAMOTO Takashi <yamamoto@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxx>
---
fs/buffer.c | 1 +
include/linux/mm.h | 1 +
mm/page-writeback.c | 13 +++----------
3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/mm.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1162,6 +1162,7 @@ extern int filemap_fault(struct vm_area_

/* mm/page-writeback.c */
int write_one_page(struct page *page, int wait);
+void task_dirty_inc(struct task_struct *tsk);

/* readahead.c */
#define VM_MAX_READAHEAD 128 /* kbytes */
Index: linux-2.6/mm/page-writeback.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/page-writeback.c
+++ linux-2.6/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ void bdi_writeout_inc(struct backing_dev
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(bdi_writeout_inc);

-static inline void task_dirty_inc(struct task_struct *tsk)
+void task_dirty_inc(struct task_struct *tsk)
{
prop_inc_single(&vm_dirties, &tsk->dirties);
}
@@ -1228,6 +1228,7 @@ int __set_page_dirty_nobuffers(struct pa
__inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
__inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info,
BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
+ task_dirty_inc(current);
task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
}
radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree,
@@ -1263,7 +1264,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(redirty_page_for_writepage
* If the mapping doesn't provide a set_page_dirty a_op, then
* just fall through and assume that it wants buffer_heads.
*/
-static int __set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
+int set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
{
struct address_space *mapping = page_mapping(page);

@@ -1281,14 +1282,6 @@ static int __set_page_dirty(struct page
}
return 0;
}
-
-int set_page_dirty(struct page *page)
-{
- int ret = __set_page_dirty(page);
- if (ret)
- task_dirty_inc(current);
- return ret;
-}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_page_dirty);

/*
Index: linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/buffer.c
+++ linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
@@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ static int __set_page_dirty(struct page
__inc_zone_page_state(page, NR_FILE_DIRTY);
__inc_bdi_stat(mapping->backing_dev_info,
BDI_RECLAIMABLE);
+ task_dirty_inc(current);
task_io_account_write(PAGE_CACHE_SIZE);
}
radix_tree_tag_set(&mapping->page_tree,
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/