Re: 2.6.29-rc4: possible circular locking dependency at btrfs_try_spin_lock

[Chris Mason]

On Mon, 2009-02-09 at 15:43 +0300, Alexander Beregalov wrote:
> Hi
> Is it false positive lockdep warning?
> 

Interesting, lockdep must be smarter in linux-next.  It's a false
positive, I'll try to fix it up.

-chris


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/