Re: [RFC PATCH 2/2] trace: splice support for tracing_pipe

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Feb 09 2009 - 04:05:06 EST



* Eduard - Gabriel Munteanu <eduard.munteanu@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Added and implemented tracing_pipe_fops->splice_read(). This allows
> userspace programs to get tracing data more efficiently.

Cool!

The structure of the splice state machine looks good - havent tested it yet.

A few comments:

> +static struct pipe_buf_operations tracing_pipe_buf_ops = {
> + .can_merge = 0,
> + .map = generic_pipe_buf_map,
> + .unmap = generic_pipe_buf_unmap,
> + .confirm = generic_pipe_buf_confirm,
> + .release = tracing_pipe_buf_release,
> + .steal = generic_pipe_buf_steal,
> + .get = generic_pipe_buf_get,
> +};

this looks nicer:

static struct pipe_buf_operations tracing_pipe_buf_ops = {
.can_merge = 0,
.map = generic_pipe_buf_map,
.unmap = generic_pipe_buf_unmap,
.confirm = generic_pipe_buf_confirm,
.release = tracing_pipe_buf_release,
.steal = generic_pipe_buf_steal,
.get = generic_pipe_buf_get,
};

(and this is how we do these things elsewhere in the tracing code)

ditto:

> + struct splice_pipe_desc spd = {
> + .pages = pages,
> + .partial = partial,
> + .nr_pages = 0, /* This gets updated below. */
> + .flags = flags,
> + .ops = &tracing_pipe_buf_ops,
> + .spd_release = tracing_spd_release_pipe,
> + };

+ for (i = 0, rem = len; i < PIPE_BUFFERS && rem; i++) {
+ pages[i] = alloc_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+
+ /* Seq buffer is page-sized, exactly what we need. */
+ for (;;) {

Ok, that's a minor bug: should check for NULL alloc_page() return.

> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&trace_types_lock);
> +
> + return ret;

please name this label as 'out_err' - which it really is. We generally use the
'out:' label for error-less exits.

Btw., this is how we do structure initializations:

> .open = tracing_open_pipe,
> .poll = tracing_poll_pipe,
> .read = tracing_read_pipe,
> + .splice_read = tracing_splice_read_pipe,
> .release = tracing_release_pipe,
> };

One more thing, i'd suggest to split this loop (which is an iterator in a larger
loop):

+ /* Seq buffer is page-sized, exactly what we need. */
+ for (;;) {
+ count = iter->seq.len;
+ ret = print_trace_line(iter);
[...]
+ }

Out into a separate helper inline function. This really is a "fill in pipe page"
logic and having it separate makes it easier to review the splice-loop code pattern
itself.

Thanks,

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/