Re: [PATCH] irq: optimize init_kstat_irqs/init_copy_kstat_irqs

[Yinghai Lu]

Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:11:24 +0100 Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> * Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 01:01:03 -0800 Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> add kzalloc_node_safe()?
>>>> I cannot find that function.
>>> His suggestion is to provide that allocator variant.
>>>
>> Oh.
>>
>> It isn't possible to write a kzalloc_node_safe(GFP_ATOMIC).  Or at
>> least, we've never worked out a way.
>>
>> Maybe I'm confused again.
> 
> Indeed - duh - more morning tea needed.
> 
> Yinghai, why are those allocations GFP_ATOMIC to begin with? These:
> 
> earth4:~/tip> grep GFP_ATOMIC kernel/irq/*.c
> kernel/irq/handle.c:	ptr = kzalloc_node(nr * sizeof(*desc->kstat_irqs), GFP_ATOMIC, node);
> kernel/irq/handle.c:	desc = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*desc), GFP_ATOMIC, node);
> kernel/irq/manage.c:	action = kmalloc(sizeof(struct irqaction), GFP_ATOMIC);
> 
> Should all be GFP_KERNEL. Wherever they are within a spinlocked section the code 
> should be restructured. All descriptor data structures should be preallocated at 
> __setup_irq() time. If we ever need to allocate dynamically later on, in the middle 
> of some difficult codepath that's a structure bug in the code.

ok.

> 
> and this one:
> 
> kernel/irq/numa_migrate.c:	desc = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*desc), GFP_ATOMIC, node);
> 
> should fail the migration silently if GFP_ATOMIC returns NULL.
it will reuse the old one.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/