Re: [PATCH] x86: fix hpet timer reinit for x86_64

From: Kirill Korotaev
Date: Thu Feb 05 2009 - 03:01:26 EST





On 2/4/09 4:49 PM, "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>
> * Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> There's a small problem with hpet_rtc_reinit function - it checks
>> for the
>> hpet_readl(HPET_COUNTER) - hpet_t1_cmp > 0
>> to continue increasing both the HPET_T1_CMP (register) and the
>> hpet_t1_cmp (variable).
>>
>> But since the HPET_COUNTER is always 32-bit, if the hpet_t1_cmp
>> is 64-bit this condition will always be FALSE once the latter hits
>> the 32-bit boundary, and we can have a situation, when we don't
>> increase the HPET_T1_CMP register high enough.
>>
>> The result - timer stops ticking, since HPET_T1_CMP becomes less,
>> than the COUNTER and never increased again.
>>
>> The solution is to cut the upper 32-bit from the hpet_t1_cmp
>> variable to make the comparison to HPET_COUNTER correct.
>>
>> Reported-by: Kirill Korotaev <dev@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> applied to tip/timers/urgent, thanks Pavel!
>
> I'm wondering, what symptoms were seen due to the bug? Did system time stop,
> or did it become erratic, or were there outright lockups?

Symptoms were observed in user space. An application doing read() on
/dev/rtc blocked sometimes for a long periods of time (as turned out - until
counter gets wrap around).

Regards,
Kirill

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/