Re: [PATCH] SLUB: revert direct page allocator pass through

[Christoph Lameter]

On Fri, 23 Jan 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Christoph Lameter
> <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > It seems that we currently need the slab allocators to compensate for the
> > performance problems in the page allocator for these higher order allocs.
> > I'd rather have the page allocator fixed but things are as they are.
>
> So, is that an ACK or a NAK for the patch?-)

Doesnt that break down Nick's order-0 dominates-the-world scheme break
down? One of the reasons for doing this was to get the page allocator
performance issues exposed and addressed.

Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/