[RFC PATCH 06/19] lockdep: simplify mark_lock()

From: Peter Zijlstra
Date: Thu Jan 22 2009 - 12:47:29 EST


remove the state iteration

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@xxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/lockdep.c | 19 +++++++------------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/lockdep.c
+++ linux-2.6/kernel/lockdep.c
@@ -2445,18 +2445,13 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct
return 0;

switch (new_bit) {
- case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ:
- case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ:
- case LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ:
- case LOCK_USED_IN_SOFTIRQ_READ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_HARDIRQ_READ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_SOFTIRQ_READ:
- case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS:
- case LOCK_USED_IN_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS:
- case LOCK_ENABLED_RECLAIM_FS_READ:
+#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \
+ case LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE: \
+ case LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE##_READ: \
+ case LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE: \
+ case LOCK_ENABLED_##__STATE##_READ:
+#include "lockdep_states.h"
+#undef LOCKDEP_STATE
ret = mark_lock_irq(curr, this, new_bit);
if (!ret)
return 0;

--

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/