Re: sparc64 build breakage...

[Ingo Molnar]

* David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:15:53 -0800 (PST)
> 
> > 
> > This change:
> > 
> > commit d7e51e66899f95dabc89b4d4c6674a6e50fa37fc
> > Author: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date:   Wed Jan 7 15:03:13 2009 -0800
> > 
> >     sparseirq: make some func to be used with genirq
> > 
> > breaks the sparc64 build:
> ..
> > This should fix it:
> > 
> > sparc64: Fix build by using kstat_irqs_cpu().
> 
> And here is a mix for the next failure.

Applied your fixes to tip/irq/sparseirq:

 e81838d: sparc64: Fix build by using kstat_irqs_cpu()
 623d3f0: sparc64: Fix build by including linux/irq.h into time_64.c

thanks David!

> But really, either linux/kernel_stat.h provides the 
> kstat_incr_irqs_this_cpu interface or linux/irq.h does, not both.

Yes, but every time someone tries to clean those dependencies up, it gets 
held up by non-genirq architectures:

 /*
  * Please do not include this file in generic code.  There is currently
  * no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held
  * within this file.
  *
  * Thanks. --rmk
  */

Meanwhile that particular comment is moot because ARM is genirq - but 
there's a handful of other non-genirq architectures so this area of code 
continues to be a mess.

I guess we could move all the APIs to kernel_stat.h. Yinghai?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/