Re: [XFS] 2.6.29-rc2: XFS internal error XFS_WANT_CORRUPTED_GOTO

[Jacek Luczak]

Dave Chinner pisze:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 03:23:01PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
>> Christoph Hellwig pisze:
>>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:58:35PM +0100, Jacek Luczak wrote:
>>>> Good job! Is there some ,,quick'' fix?
>>> The patch below makes it go away for me, alternatively just enable
>>> CONFIG_LBD.
>>>
>>>
>>> Index: linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_types.h
>>> ===================================================================
>>> --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/xfs/xfs_types.h	2009-01-20 14:55:55.806068213 +0100
>>> +++ linux-2.6/fs/xfs/xfs_types.h	2009-01-20 14:56:01.437945154 +0100
>>> @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ typedef	__uint64_t	xfs_dfilblks_t;	/* nu
>>>  /*
>>>   * Memory based types are conditional.
>>>   */
>>> -#if XFS_BIG_BLKNOS
>>> +#if 1 //XFS_BIG_BLKNOS
>>>  typedef	__uint64_t	xfs_fsblock_t;	/* blockno in filesystem (agno|agbno) */
>>>  typedef __uint64_t	xfs_rfsblock_t;	/* blockno in filesystem (raw) */
>>>  typedef __uint64_t	xfs_rtblock_t;	/* extent (block) in realtime area */
>>>
>> I've applied it and now running ,,fixed'' kernel. What I've notice is:
>> $ LC_ALL=C df -h
>> Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
>> /dev/sda1              20G  -40E   40E   -  /
>> /dev/sda5              20G  -23E   23E   -  /home
>> /dev/sda6              56G   56G  774M  99% /NORA
>> /dev/sda7              45G   44G  1.2G  98% /MAGAZYN
> 
> Please try the patch I posted this morning - it fixes the problem
> properly and shouldn't have this side effect.
> 

Your patch work for me. I've made also some tests a'la one proposed by
Christoph, here also everything works. Good work guys!

Have a nice day,

-Jacek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/