Re: spurious -ENOSPC on XFS

[Christoph Hellwig]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:28:58PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> The result must not depend on magic timer values. If it does, you end up 
> with undebbugable nondeterministic failures.
> 
> Why don't you change that 500ms wait to "wait until the flush finishes"? 
> That would be correct.

Yes, this probably would better.  Could I motivate you to come up with
a patch for that?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/