Re: [patch 2/8] compiler-gcc.h: add more comments to RELOC_HIDE

From: Linus Torvalds
Date: Wed Jan 14 2009 - 22:35:11 EST




On Thu, 15 Jan 2009, Rusty Russell wrote:

> On Tuesday 13 January 2009 04:03:49 Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > But that is not what is occurring. We do not do &var + LARGE_OFFSET.
> > Instead one does
> >
> > ((void *)&var) + LARGE_OFFSET
> >
> > or
> > ((unsigned long)&var) + LARGE_OFFSET
> >
> > The cast should cause the C compiler to drop all assumptions about size.
>
> No, and that's the point. Sorry, at this point you need to talk to a gcc expert. As I have said, I did and I believe what he told me.

Yeah, I personally believe in the "should cause the C compiler" part, but
gcc doesn't work that way. It will remember where the value came from,
even when the pointer has been cast to something else.

Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/