Re: [PATCH 2/2] ext2: Add blk_issue_flush() to syncing paths

From: Eric Sandeen
Date: Wed Jan 14 2009 - 12:48:07 EST


Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 14-01-09 11:35:50, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> Jan Kara wrote:
>>> To be really safe that the data hit the platter, we should also flush drive's
>>> writeback caches on fsync and for O_SYNC files or O_DIRSYNC inodes.
>> Seems sane, but aren't we getting really divergent behavior here between
>> ext2, ext3, and ext4 w.r.t. drive cache flushing for sync paths?
> Well, but ext3/4 should do a barrier on a transaction commit (if the user
> really cares about data integrity) and hence it implicitely does the same.
>
> Honza

Sorry, just now catching up with that other thread, which addresses this
topic. :) But yes, this seems correct... (OTOH, I thought SuSE was
carrying a patch which did add this blkdev_flush to sync for ext3...)

-Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/