Re: [patch] tlb flush_data: replace per_cpu with an array

[Frederik Deweerdt]

On Wed, Jan 14, 2009 at 04:20:01PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > To be fair, it also depends on whenever HOTPLUG_CPU is on or not (if it
> > is we allocate NR_CPUS percpu sections).
> 
> not true to my knowledge. Even a !HOTPLUG_CPU kernel doesn't
> allocate more than what is in the possible map. That would be dumb 
> if it was true, but it isn't fortunately.
My point is that possible map == NR_CPUS if HOTPLUG_CPU
> 
> I don't think it does.
>  In that case, which is Ubuntu's
> > and Fedora's, 
> 
> You're saying that Ubuntu and Fedora do not support suspend to ram?
> (suspend to ram requires CPU hotplug). At least my Fedora box
> does S3 just fine so that cannot be correct.
> 
> we do save memory.
> > This would make for a fairly long changelog, how about a link to this
> > thread, and removing the NR_CPUS bit?
> 
> My original paragraph is correct and it's not long. At least your
> claim is just wrong.
> 
> -Andi
> 
> -- 
> ak@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/