Re: [PATCH -tip] x86: headers - include linux/types.h instead ofasm/types.h

From: Cyrill Gorcunov
Date: Tue Jan 13 2009 - 08:25:43 EST


[Cyrill Gorcunov - Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 04:10:20PM +0300]
...
| | >
| | > well... on the other hand I'm not sure if it's really
| | > a good idea to include linux/types.h where we need only
| | > __u[8,16] and so on definitions.
| |
| | Well, linux/types.h is supposed to be a 'lightweight', 'core data types
| | only' kind of header file, so including it is not wrong per se.
| |
| | Sam, is there some other preferred way perhaps to resolve these?
| |
| | Ingo
| |
|
| Until such a file not passed to some *.S. For example for e820.h
| we have it included to arch/x86/boot/header.S but fortunately
| we're bound by __ASSEMBLY__. So there linux/types.h shouldn't hurt.
| Will check others and report then.
|
| - Cyrill -

ok, have checked -- this patch seems to be safe.

- Cyrill -
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/