Re: [PATCH -v8][RFC] mutex: implement adaptive spinning

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 12:14 -0500, Chris Mason wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 17:50 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > 
> > > (the file stat run is total run time, so lower is better.  The other
> > > numbers are files or MB per second, so higher is better)
> > > 
> > > For the file create run, v8 had much lower system time than v7,
> > > averaging 1s of sys time per proc instead of 1.6s.
> > 
> > Right, how about the spread in completion time, because that is the only
> > reason I tried this fairness stuff, because you reported massive
> > differences there.
> > 
> 
> I reran the numbers with a slightly different kernel config and they
> have changed somewhat.  These are just for the 4k file create run, all
> numbers in files created per second (and the numbers are stable across
> runs)
> 
> v8 avg 176.90 median 171.85 std 12.49 high 215.97 low 165.54
> v7 avg 169.02 median 163.77 std 16.82 high 267.95 low 157.95

Any opinions on the fairness matter, will -v9 be unlocked and unfair
again?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/