Re: [PATCH] add b+tree library

[Johannes Berg]

On Sat, 2009-01-10 at 20:41 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Johannes Berg <johannes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Also, to elaborate on that answer, I'm going to use this as a sort of
> > hash table for wireless, where it ensures better scalability than a pure
> > hashtable from quiet environments (say wireless off on an airplane) to
> > your wireless test lab (100+ access points)
> 
> Is there any particular reason you can't use the standard rbtrees
> for that?

It just seemed like a lot of overhead, no particular reason I guess.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part