Re: TSC not updating after resume: Bug or Feature?

[Thomas Gleixner]

Fabio,

On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, Fabio Comolli wrote:
> Hi Thomas.
> 
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:36 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >> > * Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > > By the way, I don't know if it matters but the problema happened with
> >> > > > in-kernel hibernation and also in out-of-tree TuxOnIce hibernation.
> >> > > > Maybe this can help debugging the issue, I don't know.
> >> > >
> >> > > Hmm, does not ring a bell here. Can you please apply the patch below to
> >> > > mainline and retest ?
> >> >
> >> > ... and he should send a dmesg after a suspend cycle, right?
> >>
> >> Yes :)
> >>
> >> I digged more in the bugzillas. Toralf added some debug to
> >> __update_sched_clock():
> >>
> >> -       max_clock = wrap_max(scd->clock, scd->tick_gtod + TICK_NSEC);
> >> +       max_clock = scd->tick_gtod + TICK_NSEC;
> >> +       if (scd->clock > max_clock)
> >> +               printk(KERN_INFO "%d %d\n", scd->clock, max_clock);
> >>
> >> The interesting output is:
> >>
> >> Dec 14 21:55:55 n22 Back to C!
> >> Dec 14 21:55:55 n22 Extended CMOS year: 2000
> >> Dec 14 21:55:55 n22 Force enabled HPET at resume
> >> Dec 14 21:55:55 n22 212611283 77
> >>
> >> The 77 is totaly bogus and it's likely not just a truncation of the
> >> 64bit value because (scd->clock > max_clock) evaluates to true. This
> >> output is _AFTER_ timekeeping resume because the HPET force enable
> >> message comes from timekeeping resume.
> >
> > Seems I'm talking to myself, but I think I finally decoded the
> > mystery:
> >
> > resume()
> >  cpufreq_resume()
> >    tsc:time_cpufreq_notifier()
> >      set_cyc2ns_scale()
> >        sched_clock_idle_sleep_event()
> >          sched_clock_tick()
> >            ktime_get()
> >              hpet_read()
> >
> > This happens _BEFORE_ timekeeping has resumed, so hpet_read() returns
> > nonsense and the timekeeping code uses the stale pre suspend
> > xtime/clocksource reference values to calculate the time. So the gtod
> > reference in sched_clock can result in total crap depending on the
> > time when the suspend happened.
> >
> > Shaggys patch clamps sched_clock to the stale scd->clock value which
> > might explain the further wreckage.
> >
> > The above sequence happens only for CPUs with a CPU frequency coupled
> > TSC, so on newer machines with CPU frequency invariant TSC this does
> > not happen.
> >
> > /me stomps off to find a box to confirm that.
> >
> 
> Ok, just for reference here is my
> 
> fcomolli@hawking:~> cat /proc/cpuinfo
> processor	: 0
> vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
> cpu family	: 6
> model		: 13
> model name	: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz
> stepping	: 8
> cpu MHz		: 800.000
> cache size	: 2048 KB
> fdiv_bug	: no
> hlt_bug		: no
> f00f_bug	: no
> coma_bug	: no
> fpu		: yes
> fpu_exception	: yes
> cpuid level	: 2
> wp		: yes
> flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
> pat clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss tm pbe nx up bts est tm2
> bogomips	: 1596.95
> clflush size	: 64
> power management:

Can please you revert the last patch and apply the following ? Does
the WARN_ON trigger ?

Thanks,

	tglx
---
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index fa05e88..0d1526d 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -46,6 +46,9 @@ struct timespec xtime __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
 struct timespec wall_to_monotonic __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
 static unsigned long total_sleep_time;		/* seconds */
 
+/* flag for if timekeeping is suspended */
+static int timekeeping_suspended;
+
 static struct timespec xtime_cache __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
 void update_xtime_cache(u64 nsec)
 {
@@ -92,6 +95,8 @@ void getnstimeofday(struct timespec *ts)
 	unsigned long seq;
 	s64 nsecs;
 
+	WARN_ON(timekeeping_suspended);
+
 	do {
 		seq = read_seqbegin(&xtime_lock);
 
@@ -299,8 +304,6 @@ void __init timekeeping_init(void)
 	write_sequnlock_irqrestore(&xtime_lock, flags);
 }
 
-/* flag for if timekeeping is suspended */
-static int timekeeping_suspended;
 /* time in seconds when suspend began */
 static unsigned long timekeeping_suspend_time;
 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/