Re: linux-next: Tree for December 19 (new CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESCoption)

From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Fri Dec 19 2008 - 16:08:30 EST


Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> On Friday 19 December 2008, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20081218:
>
> Just few very minor issues w.r.t. "x86, sparseirq: move irq_desc according
> to smp_affinity, v7" (commit 48a1b10aff588833b73994704c47bbd0deb73e9c):
>
> +config NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC
> + bool "Move irq desc when changing irq smp_affinity"
> + depends on SPARSE_IRQ && SMP
> + default n
> + help
> + This enables moving irq_desc to cpu/node that irq will use handled.
> +
> + If you don't know what to do here, say N.
>
> This is a bit confusing (at least I was confused since I don't have NUMA
> set in my config) -- either it should depend on NUMA or the config option
> name should be changed.

should be changed to
depends on SPARSE_IRQ && NUMA

>
> @@ -2346,14 +2466,34 @@ static void irq_complete_move(struct irq_desc **descp)
> struct irq_cfg *cfg = desc->chip_data;
> unsigned vector, me;
>
> - if (likely(!cfg->move_in_progress))
> + if (likely(!cfg->move_in_progress)) {
> +#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA_MIGRATE_IRQ_DESC
> + if (likely(!cfg->move_desc_pending))
> + return;
> +
> + /* domain is not change, but affinity is changed */
>
> this comment sounds weird

for logical flat mode, domain will be online_cpu_mask.
so need to move irq_desc when smp_affinity is changed.

>
> perhaps: /* only affinity is changed */ would be better?
>
> +++ b/kernel/irq/numa_migrate.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> +/*
> + * linux/kernel/irq/handle.c
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 1992, 1998-2006 Linus Torvalds, Ingo Molnar
> + * Copyright (C) 2005-2006, Thomas Gleixner, Russell King
> + *
> + * This file contains the core interrupt handling code.
> + *
> + * Detailed information is available in Documentation/DocBook/genericirq
> + *
> + */
>
> hmmm? ;-)

seperated from irq/handle.c

oh, will remove those lines.

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/