[PATCH v7 1/8] sched: convert BALANCE_FOR_xx_POWER to inline functions

From: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan
Date: Thu Dec 18 2008 - 12:53:20 EST


BALANCE_FOR_MC_POWER and similar macros defined in sched.h are
not constants and have various condition checks and significant
amount of code that is not suitable to be contain in a macro.
Also there could be side effects on the expressions passed to
some of them like test_sd_parent().

This patch converts all complex macros related to power savings
balance to inline functions.

Signed-off-by: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---

include/linux/sched.h | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
include/linux/topology.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index 55e30d1..311122f 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -764,15 +764,23 @@ enum cpu_idle_type {
#define SD_SERIALIZE 1024 /* Only a single load balancing instance */
#define SD_WAKE_IDLE_FAR 2048 /* Gain latency sacrificing cache hit */

-#define BALANCE_FOR_MC_POWER \
- (sched_smt_power_savings ? SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE : 0)
+extern int sched_mc_power_savings, sched_smt_power_savings;
+
+static inline int sd_balance_for_mc_power(void)
+{
+ if (sched_smt_power_savings)
+ return SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;

-#define BALANCE_FOR_PKG_POWER \
- ((sched_mc_power_savings || sched_smt_power_savings) ? \
- SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE : 0)
+ return 0;
+}

-#define test_sd_parent(sd, flag) ((sd->parent && \
- (sd->parent->flags & flag)) ? 1 : 0)
+static inline int sd_balance_for_package_power(void)
+{
+ if (sched_mc_power_savings | sched_smt_power_savings)
+ return SD_POWERSAVINGS_BALANCE;
+
+ return 0;
+}


struct sched_group {
@@ -1358,6 +1366,15 @@ struct task_struct {
struct list_head *scm_work_list;
};

+/* Test a flag in parent sched domain */
+static inline int test_sd_parent(struct sched_domain *sd, int flag)
+{
+ if (sd->parent && (sd->parent->flags & flag))
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
/*
* Priority of a process goes from 0..MAX_PRIO-1, valid RT
* priority is 0..MAX_RT_PRIO-1, and SCHED_NORMAL/SCHED_BATCH
@@ -2215,8 +2232,6 @@ __trace_special(void *__tr, void *__data,
extern long sched_setaffinity(pid_t pid, const cpumask_t *new_mask);
extern long sched_getaffinity(pid_t pid, cpumask_t *mask);

-extern int sched_mc_power_savings, sched_smt_power_savings;
-
extern void normalize_rt_tasks(void);

#ifdef CONFIG_GROUP_SCHED
diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
index 117f1b7..7f10439 100644
--- a/include/linux/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ void arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
| SD_WAKE_AFFINE \
| SD_WAKE_BALANCE \
| SD_SHARE_PKG_RESOURCES\
- | BALANCE_FOR_MC_POWER, \
+ | sd_balance_for_mc_power(),\
.last_balance = jiffies, \
.balance_interval = 1, \
}
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ void arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
| SD_BALANCE_FORK \
| SD_WAKE_AFFINE \
| SD_WAKE_BALANCE \
- | BALANCE_FOR_PKG_POWER,\
+ | sd_balance_for_package_power(),\
.last_balance = jiffies, \
.balance_interval = 1, \
}

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/