Re: [PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86

[Rusty Russell]

On Thursday 18 December 2008 09:24:19 Mike Travis wrote:
> Rusty Russell wrote:
> > Like cpu_coregroup_map, but returns a (const) pointer.
> > 
> > (This will go to Ingo separately as part of the x86 series, just
> > airing it here for thoroughness).
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Travis <travis@xxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> I've pulled this patch into the queue for my cpus4096-for-ingo tree.
> 
> 	[PATCH 1/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): x86
> 
> I can also line up a queue for sched related changes:
> 
> 	[PATCH 4/4] cpumask: Replace cpu_coregroup_map with cpu_coregroup_map()
> 
> Is there any status on the corresponding changes for sparc, s390?  (I assume
> that they'll need to be merged into linux-next?)
> 
> 	[PATCH 2/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): sparc
> 	[PATCH 3/4] cpumask: cpu_coregroup_mask(): s390

You can't take 4/4 until 2/4 and 3/4 are merged, and since it's not
x86-specific as well, we'll leave it in my tree.

Thanks,
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/