Re: questions about native alpha futex implementation

[Roland Dreier]

 > Alpha uses a generic futex implementation, which causes some problems [1].

Summarizing this: the generic futex implementation leaves
futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() as a stub that just returns -ENOSYS, and
glibc robust futex code can't handle this return value, which leads to
glibc tests hanging.

 > I've read through the code, and it appears as if the implementation
 > could be done by using the ldq_l/stq_c instructions, relatively easy I
 > might add. I'm definitely interested in implementing this, but first...
 > 
 > I have only a few questions.
 > 
 > 1) What are the benefits of a native futex implementation, other than
 > fixing the glibc test failures?

Presumably native implementations can use optimized assembly, which
would be somewhat faster than a generic implementation in C.

 > 2) Is there a technical reason it hasn't been implemented on Alpha?

I don't know for sure, but I would guess it's just that no one has cared
enough about optimizing futexes on alpha.

A native implementation for alpha is probably an amusing project, but
also figuring out a way of implementing the missing operations for
generic futexes would be nice too (given that glibc uses them now).
Although a generic futex_atomic_cmpxchg_inatomic() that works for SMP
might be tricky.

 - R.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/