Re: [PATCH last/many] x86: checking framework for correct use of ENTRY/PROC

[Alexander van Heukelum]

On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 02:51:53PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:17 PM, Alexander van Heukelum
> <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > [ DO NOT APPLY (yet...) At this point this patch will
> > just cause the build to abort due to annotation errors
> > found. ]
> >
> > Introduce a checking framework to check correct pairing
> > of ENTRY/END and PROC/ENDPROC. It also checks that the
> > annotations are not nested. I have used the ideas and
> > most of the implementation from Cyrill Gorcunov who
> > introduced the framework to check for mismatching
> > KPROBE_ENTRY annotations, which was however soon made
> > obsolete by the removal of KPROBE_ENTRY/KPROBE_END.
> >
> > Checks performed:
> >  o  END must terminate an ENTRY annotation
> >  o  ENDPROC must terminate a PROC annotation
> >  o  ENTRY or PROC cannot be nested inside
> >        another ENTRY or PROC section.
> >
> > Finally the macro ENTRY_PROC_FINAL is introduced to
> > enable checking correct closing of PROC and ENTRY
> > sections at the end of assembly files.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@xxxxxxxxx>
> ...
> 
> Thanks Alexander!
> 
> You know I think you meant __ASSEMBLY__ while
> were typing __ASSEMBLER__. Don't you? :)

If it matters there is some cleanup to do in the kernel tree ;).

Greetings,
    Alexander
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/