Re: GPIO: Fix probe() error return in gpio driver probes

[David Brownell]

On Sunday 14 December 2008, Ben Dooks wrote:
> Has anyone reveiwed this patch? Are there any comments, or can this
> be commited at somepoint (even if it is during the next merge window)?

I was thinking that -EINVAL is almost the least informative
diagnostic code possible, since so many places return it
that it's usually hard to find out *which* invalid parameter
triggered ...

Is there a less-overloaded code you could return?

I have no issue with the patch other than that.

- Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/