Re: [PATCH v2] amiflop: get rid of sleep_on calls

From: Geert Uytterhoeven
Date: Sun Dec 14 2008 - 11:21:32 EST


On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Andreas Bombe wrote:
> Apart from sleep_on() calls that could be easily converted to
> wait_event() and completion calls amiflop also used a flag in ms_delay()
> and ms_isr() as a custom mutex for ms_delay() without a need for
> explicit unlocking. I converted that to a standard mutex.
>
> The replacement for the unconditional sleep_on() in fd_motor_on() is a
> complete_all() together with a INIT_COMPLETION() before the mod_timer()
> call. It appears to me that fd_motor_on() might be called concurrently
> and fd_select() does not guarantee mutual exclusivity in the case the
> same drive gets selected again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Bombe <aeb@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> This version changes the struct semaphore used as mutex into a struct
> mutex. Still only compile tested.
>
> I just tried out my Amiga and it appears to be in better shape than
> expected. So I might get to actually test it when I find the time. My
> Amiga has no Linux installation so I need to whip up a ramdisk or
> something else sufficient to test it.

I think the good old ELF ramdisk at
ftp://ftp.uni-erlangen.de/pub/unix/Linux/680x0/v2.0/filesys/filesys-ELF-2.0.x-1400K-2.gz
should be sufficient to give it a try...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/