[PATCH] e1000e: fix double release of mutex

From: Jeff Kirsher
Date: Fri Dec 12 2008 - 00:20:59 EST


During a reset, releasing the swflag after it failed to be acquired would
cause a double unlock of the mutex. Instead, test whether acquisition of
the swflag was successful and if not, do not release the swflag. The reset
must still be done to bring the device to a quiescent state.

This resolves [BUG 12200] BUG: bad unlock balance detected! e1000e
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12200

Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
---

drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c | 9 +++++++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c b/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
index 523b971..d115a6d 100644
--- a/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/e1000e/ich8lan.c
@@ -1893,12 +1893,17 @@ static s32 e1000_reset_hw_ich8lan(struct e1000_hw *hw)
ctrl |= E1000_CTRL_PHY_RST;
}
ret_val = e1000_acquire_swflag_ich8lan(hw);
+ /* Whether or not the swflag was acquired, we need to reset the part */
hw_dbg(hw, "Issuing a global reset to ich8lan");
ew32(CTRL, (ctrl | E1000_CTRL_RST));
msleep(20);

- /* release the swflag because it is not reset by hardware reset */
- e1000_release_swflag_ich8lan(hw);
+ if (!ret_val) {
+ /* release the swflag because it is not reset by
+ * hardware reset
+ */
+ e1000_release_swflag_ich8lan(hw);
+ }

ret_val = e1000e_get_auto_rd_done(hw);
if (ret_val) {

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/