Re: Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c

[Kevin D. Kissell]

Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:36:54AM +1100, Nick Andrew wrote:
>   
> > From: Nick Andrew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 11:36:54 +1100
> > To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@xxxxxxxx>,
> > 	Lucas Woods <woodzy@xxxxxxxxx>, Nick Andrew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> > 	Ralf Baechle <ralf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-mips@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Subject: Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c
> >
> > Fix incorrect use of loose in vpe.c
> >
> > From: Nick Andrew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > It should be 'lose', not 'loose'.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nick Andrew <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >     
>
> Thanks, applied.  Note that the address you used for Kevin Kissel to post
> your patch is no longer valid.
>   
Yeah, but I'm still on the mailing list, so I saw it.  I don't "own" 
that particular module,
but for whatever it's worth, I'm OK with fixing the comment - though I'm 
surprised
that checkpatch let a non-canonical multi-line comment block like that 
go by.  ;o)

         Regards,

         Kevin K.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/