Re: [patch 2/3] performance counters: documentation

[David Miller]

From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:50:02 -0800

> I would like to respectfully disagree with this some. The kernel needs
> to abstract hardware to some degree for userspace. The problem in this
> case is that userspace can't really do a better job, in fact it can
> only do a worse job since it lacks the coordination capability of
> knowing it has full control of all the hardware registers. 

The perfmon context abstraction dealt with that.  Code using the
perfmon interfaces provided a set of counter and control register
values to the kernel.

The kernel merely loaded and unloaded them when a process (or group of
processes) ran.

The kernel is a validity checker, and that minimal stuff is exactly
what the perfmon kernel component implemented.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/