Re: Regression from 2.6.26: Hibernation (possibly suspend) broken on Toshiba R500 (bisected)

[Frans Pop]

OOn Thursday 04 December 2008, you wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, in principle it may be related to the way we handle bridges
> > during resume
>
> This is a hibernate-only issue for you, right? Or is it about regular
> suspend-to-ram too?

It is regular suspend to ram.

I feel now confident in saying that with the debug patch resume from STR 
is 100% reliable. And the two workarounds I was using to improve resume 
reliability are no longer needed:
- unloading e1000e before suspend
- using aggressive powersave setting on snd_hda_intel to ensure that
  sound controller was already sleeping before entering suspend

I don't think we have any theory yet on how those workarounds were helping 
to improve things, right?

> Well, how stable has hibernate been on that particular machine
> historically?

I cannot comment on this as I have not owned this laptop long enough.


One other thing: the ohci1394 "irq 19: nobody cared" issue is definitely 
unrelated as I just got one during a resume with the debug patch.

Cheers,
FJP
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/