Re: writing file to disk: not as easy as it looks

From: Mikulas Patocka
Date: Wed Dec 03 2008 - 12:43:30 EST


> On Wed, Dec 03, 2008 at 09:46:40AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Yes. fsync() seeems surprisingly high on Rusty's list of broken
> > interfaces classification ('impossible to use correctly').

BTW where is that list.

> To be fair, fsync() was primarily intended for making sure that the
> data had been written to disk, and not necessarily as a way of making
> sure that write errors would be properly reflected back to the
> application. As you've pointed out, it's not really adequate for that
> purpose.
>
> - Ted

Well, what else do you want to use for databases? (where crashing the
whole computer makes less damage than pretending that transaction was
committed while it wasn't).

Mikulas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/