Re: PATCH: /proc/acpi/alarm: handle day-of-month wraparound on readback

[Mark Lord]

Len Brown wrote:
> I don't have a /proc/acpi/alarm due to this:
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS_MODULE) || 
> !defined(CONFIG_X86)
> /* use /sys/class/rtc/rtcX/wakealarm instead; it's not ACPI-specific */
> #else
> #define HAVE_ACPI_LEGACY_ALARM
> #endif
..

Yeah.. bit of a nuisance that.
I regularly apply this patch to my own kernels:

--- old/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c	2008-01-06 16:39:45.000000000 -0500
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/sleep/proc.c	2008-01-06 17:35:35.000000000 -0500
@@ -78,11 +78,11 @@
}
#endif				/* CONFIG_ACPI_PROCFS */

-#if defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS_MODULE) || !defined(CONFIG_X86)
+//#if defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS) || defined(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS_MODULE) || !defined(CONFIG_X86)
/* use /sys/class/rtc/rtcX/wakealarm instead; it's not ACPI-specific */
-#else
+//#else
#define	HAVE_ACPI_LEGACY_ALARM
-#endif
+//#endif

#ifdef	HAVE_ACPI_LEGACY_ALARM

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/