[PATCH] x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on EXPERIMENTAL again

[Rafael J. Wysocki]

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Subject: x86: Make NUMA on 32-bit depend on EXPERIMENTAL again

My previous patch to make CONFIG_NUMA on x86_32 depend on BROKEN
turned out to be unnecessary, after all, since the source of the
hibernation vs CONFIG_NUMA problem turned out to be the fact that
we didn't take the NUMA KVA remapping into account in the
hibernation code.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxxx>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 arch/x86/Kconfig |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/Kconfig
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/Kconfig
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/Kconfig
@@ -957,7 +957,7 @@ config ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT
 config NUMA
 	bool "Numa Memory Allocation and Scheduler Support (EXPERIMENTAL)"
 	depends on SMP
+	depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM64G && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_BIGSMP || X86_SUMMIT && ACPI) && EXPERIMENTAL)
-	depends on X86_64 || (X86_32 && HIGHMEM64G && (X86_NUMAQ || X86_BIGSMP || X86_SUMMIT && ACPI) && BROKEN)
 	default n if X86_PC
 	default y if (X86_NUMAQ || X86_SUMMIT || X86_BIGSMP)
 	help
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/