Re: [PATCH] account_group_exec_runtime: fix the racy usage of->signal

[Ingo Molnar]

* Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On 11/07, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > --- K-28/kernel/sched_stats.h~A_G_E_R_FIX	2008-11-07 17:32:02.000000000 +0100
> > > +++ K-28/kernel/sched_stats.h	2008-11-07 17:44:39.000000000 +0100
> > > @@ -351,10 +351,12 @@ static inline void account_group_exec_ru
> > >  					      unsigned long long ns)
> > >  {
> > >  	struct signal_struct *sig;
> > > +	unsigned long flags;
> > >
> > > -	sig = tsk->signal;
> > > -	if (unlikely(!sig))
> > > +	if (unlikely(!lock_task_sighand(tsk, &flags)))
> > >  		return;
> >
> > i think this will lock up:
> 
> Ah. I worried about this, but convinced myself this is OK...
> 
> > the signal lock must not nest inside the rq
> > lock, and these accounting functions are called from within the
> > scheduler.
> 
> Why? we seem to never do task_rq_lock() under ->siglock ?

signal_wake_up() ?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/