Re: [PATCH][v3] blktrace: conversion to tracepoints
From: Jens Axboe
Date: Fri Nov 07 2008 - 09:33:52 EST
On Fri, Nov 07 2008, Alan D. Brunelle wrote:
>
> >
> > I'll apply this for 2.6.29. I'm assuming you have tested this as well?
> >
>
> FYI: I tested this on a 16-way AMD x86_64 box (128GB RAM, a couple of
> Smart Array (CCISS) P800's). Running Jens' for-2.6.29 git tree versus a
> recent Linus 2.6.28-rc3 tree. I was doing kernel makes (10 passes for
> both kernels), and found that things worked just fine. All values below
> are in seconds:
>
> 2.6.28-rc3:
>
> Part Min Avg Max Dev
> -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
> untar 17.996 22.565 23.522 1.690
> mk-cfg 3.279 3.454 3.529 0.070
> mk-kern 140.837 141.557 142.549 0.626
> mk-clean 10.460 11.604 12.710 0.758
> -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
> Combd 172.941 179.180 181.600 2.470
> ======== ======= ======= ======= =======
> %sys 7.67% 7.78% 8.03% 0.114
>
>
> Jens' origin/for-2.6.29:
>
> Part Min Avg Max Dev
> -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
> untar 18.138 22.576 24.279 1.693
> mk-cfg 3.270 3.483 3.751 0.118
> mk-kern 141.290 142.115 142.666 0.439
> mk-clean 8.263 9.609 10.211 0.624
> -------- ------- ------- ------- -------
> Combd 173.736 177.783 179.654 1.786
> ======== ======= ======= ======= =======
> %sys 7.77% 7.85% 8.01% 0.074
>
>
> Not sure why the 'make clean' portion of the runs went noticeably better
> with the newer code, but in any event, I don't see much difference
> elsewhere, and for sure the blktrace portion of things worked correctly.
> [blktrace + blkparse + blkrawverify + btt all worked just fine out of
> the box.]
Thanks a lot for running that test Alan, I think it looks fine!
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/