Re: [patch] add /proc/pid/stack to dump task's stack trace

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Fri Nov 07 2008 - 03:33:20 EST



* Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Fri, Nov 07, 2008 at 08:59:25AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > > > + * buffer size used for proc read. See proc_info_read().
> > > > > + * 4K page size but our output routines use some slack for overruns
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +#define PROC_BLOCK_SIZE (3*1024)
> > >
> > > That sounds like a proper limit - the hard limit for this particular
> > > printout function is 4096-170, so we are well within the
> > > PROC_BLOCK_SIZE range.
> >
> > ok, i've added Ken's patch to tip/core/stacktrace and started testing
> > it.
> >
> > Alexey, i've added your Acked-by because you appeared to like the
> > patch - let me know if i should remove it.
>
> Of course, I don't like it!
>
> Switch to seqfiles, add entry in TID table as well.
>
> The idea is good, though.

oh well - Ken, could you please switch it to seqfiles?

It should be something like this to convert the currently sweet and
trivial function into a much more complex seqfile iterator splitup:

- the ::start method does the kmalloc of a loop state structure like
this:

{
struct stack_trace backtrace;
unsigned long entries[MAX_STACK_TRACE_DEPTH];

int iterator;
}

and saves the trace. (struct stack_trace trace can be on-stack, it's
only needed for the save_stack_trace() - and we keep the entries
after that.)

- the ::stop method does the kfree of the loop state.

- the ::show method prints a single line, based on ->entries[->iterator]

- the ::next method does ->iterator++, and returns NULL if iterator
reaches ->backtrace.nr_entries.

it will be more source code, larger kernel image, it will be more
fragile and will be harder to review, and it wont actually matter in
practice because 99.9999% of the backtraces we care about have a size
smaller than 3K. (and where they get larger clipping them to the first
3K is perfectly fine)

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/