Re: [PATCH] x86, ioremap: use %pR in printk

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Mon Oct 20 2008 - 05:05:30 EST



* Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 09:12 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > * Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > This converts things in drivers/pci to use %pR to printout the
> > > content of a struct resource instead of hand-casted %llx or
> > > other variants.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > cool!
> >
> > Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxx>
> >
> > there's also two places in arch/x86/mm/ioremap.c that could use this
> > straight away - see the (untested) patch below.
>
> No, you don't pass it a phys_addr_t or a resource_size_t, you pass it a
> struct resource *

oops ... i only looked at:

+ char sym[4*sizeof(resource_size_t) + 8];

and assumed that it was a resource_size_t printout format :-/

while printing out ranges is useful too, it's by far not the only source
of ugliness all around resource_size_t.

> Now, I would have liked to have a way to print a resource_size_t (or
> phys_addr_t) but that's harder because we need pointers for the magic
> typechecking to work (among others).
>
> Maybe we could create a special format for a
> pointer-to-resource_size_t and pass &foo on callers but that's
> fishy...

would be very nice to just have support for all the native types that
the kernel uses. %pR is still a convenient shortcut.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/