Re: [dm-devel] [PATCH 2/2] dm: Add support for data integrity to DM

[Martin K. Petersen]

>>>>> "Kiyoshi" == Kiyoshi Ueda <k-ueda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Kiyoshi> Creating another function (e.g. dm_table_set_integrity(t,
Kiyoshi> md)) may be better, since then you wouldn't need dm_queue()
Kiyoshi> nor need to change the function interface of
Kiyoshi> dm_table_set_restrictions() I think.

You are right.  Originally I had more reasons for having that calling
interface change but that's no longer the case.  I'll fan the
integrity bits out to a separate function.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/