Re: [PATCH v9] Unified trace buffer

From: Martin Bligh
Date: Sat Sep 27 2008 - 16:07:29 EST


>> that's even worse i think :-/ And this isnt bikeshed-painting really,
>> the RNGBF_ name hurts my eyes and RB_ is definitely confusing to read.
>> (as the rbtree constants are in capitals as well and similarly named)
>>
>> RING_TYPE_PADDING
>>
>> or:
>>
>> RINGBUF_TYPE_PADDING
>>
>> yes, it's longer, but still, saner.
>
> I don't mind the extra typing, it is just a bit more difficult to keep in
> the 80 character line limit.

Would using tb_ (trace buffer) rather than rb_ help ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/