Re: [PATCH 9/12] memcg allocate all page_cgroup at boot

From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
Date: Thu Sep 25 2008 - 21:16:20 EST


On Fri, 26 Sep 2008 10:17:54 +0900
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:40:47 -0700
> Dave Hansen <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:32 +0900, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> > > @@ -949,6 +953,11 @@ struct mem_section {
> > >
> > > /* See declaration of similar field in struct zone */
> > > unsigned long *pageblock_flags;
> > > +#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_MEM_RES_CTLR
> > > + /* see page_cgroup.h */
> > > + struct page_cgroup *page_cgroup;
> > > + unsigned long pad;
> > > +#endif
> > > };
> >
> > I thought the use of this variable was under the
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP
> >
> > options. Otherwise, we unconditionally bloat mem_section, right?
> >
> Hmmm......Oh, yes ! nice catch.
>
> Thanks, I'll fix.

But in reality, this is under CONFIG_SPARSEMEM and if CONFIG_SPARSEMEM,
FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP is not true (I think).
Hmm..Maybe I shouldn't use checking CONFIG_FLAT_NODE_MEM_MAP and should
just use CONFIG_SPARSEMEM check. I'll rewrite.

Thanks,
-Kame

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/