Re: [PATCH 7/7] x86: print out irq nr for msi/ht -v2

From: Bjorn Helgaas
Date: Thu Sep 25 2008 - 13:52:41 EST


On Thursday 25 September 2008 11:07:17 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 8:00 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thursday 25 September 2008 12:13:43 am Yinghai Lu wrote:
> >> v2: fix hpet compiling
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> ---
> >> arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 3 +++
> >> arch/x86/kernel/io_apic.c | 7 +++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
> >> index 422c577..686505a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
> >> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c
> >> @@ -467,6 +467,9 @@ static int hpet_setup_irq(struct hpet_dev *dev)
> >> irq_set_affinity(dev->irq, cpumask_of_cpu(dev->cpu));
> >> enable_irq(dev->irq);
> >>
> >> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "hpet: %s is using irq %#x aka %d for MSI\n",
> >> + dev->name, dev->irq, dev->irq);
> >> +
> >
> > Why do we want to print the irq as hex? Do we do that anywhere else?
> > I think we should pick one format and stick with it, and I think
> > decimal is the logical choice because it's the most common.
>
> when sparseirq is enabled, irq for msi will be bus_nr/dev/func + 12bits.
> so show it as hex is more straight. but we can not use hex in
> /proc/interrupts --ABI want decimal.
>
> just try to print out...in log, so user could get some idea that who
> is using it...

I think it'd be better to just print the MSI IRQ number in decimal
using a dev_printk(). Then the connection is obvious and we don't
need to make everything ugly by having IRQs in both decimal and hex.

I know it's a nuisance to make hpet use dev_printk because it's
pretty muddled as far as getting a struct device. But I'd rather
fix that than add confusion like this.

Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/