Re: [PATCH 2/2] file capabilities: remove CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES

From: Andrew G. Morgan
Date: Wed Sep 24 2008 - 01:00:23 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Acked-by: Andrew G. Morgan <morgan@xxxxxxxxxx>

Cheers

Andrew

Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Remove the option to compile the kernel without file capabilities. Not
> compiling file capabilities actually makes the kernel less safe, as it
> includes the possibility for a task changing another task's capabilities.
>
> Some are concerned that userspace tools (and user education) are not
> up to the task of properly configuring file capabilities on a system.
> For those cases, there is now the ability to boot with the no_file_caps
> boot option. This will prevent file capabilities from being used in
> the capabilities recalculation at exec, but will not change the rest
> of the kernel behavior which used to be switchable using the
> CONFIG_SECURITY_FILE_CAPABILITIES option.
>
> Signed-off-by: Serge Hallyn <serue@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/open.c | 8 --
> include/linux/capability.h | 2 -
> include/linux/init_task.h | 4 -
> kernel/capability.c | 158 --------------------------------------------
> security/Kconfig | 9 ---
> security/commoncap.c | 53 ---------------
> 6 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 234 deletions(-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFI2ckn+bHCR3gb8jsRAh1QAJ9yEYEdnUgOn5w18u6DgXNKCnAbWACgnq8j
70Oa+pgYJpRVsIPMSJcUGhY=
=26lW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/