Re: [PATCH 5/5] watchdog: introduce platform_data and remove cpu conditional code

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:32:39PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> @@ -469,17 +515,26 @@ static struct platform_device omap_wdt_device = {
>  
>  static void omap_init_wdt(void)
>  {
> -	if (cpu_is_omap16xx())
> +	if (cpu_is_omap16xx()) {
> +		omap_wdt_pdata.fck = "armwdt_ck";
>  		wdt_resources[0].start = 0xfffeb000;
> -	else if (cpu_is_omap2420())
> +	} else if (cpu_is_omap2420()) {
> +		omap_wdt_pdata.fck = "mpu_wdt_ick";
> +		omap_wdt_pdata.ick = "mpu_wdt_fck";

What happened to leaving this stuff inside omap_wdt.c as I said
during the previous review?  I really don't want to see such cleanups
when the real answer is to fix the OMAP clock API implementation.  It
just makes for more unnecessary noise when doing this, and then yet more
noise when we fix the OMAP clock API.

Please get rid of this and leave the clock naming crap inside omap_wdt.c.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/