Re: [PATCH 2.6.27-rc5 resubmit] Fix itimer/many thread hang.

From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thu Sep 18 2008 - 06:24:55 EST



* Frank Mayhar <fmayhar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I finally finished this. Yeah, there's a visible size difference,
> although it's small:
>
> bobble ~/build/linux-2.6>size vmlinux
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 6417840 824160 578416 7820416 775480 vmlinux
>
> bobble ~/build/up-simplify-tree>size vmlinux
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 6417999 824160 578416 7820575 77551f vmlinux
>
> For a difference of 159 bytes. Not big, but nonzero. The delta patch
> (relative to a tree containing all suggested changes _except_ this
> simplification) follows:

i'd not worry about those 160 bytes - getting this stuff to work fine is
far more important. Details around threading seem to be one of the
slowest converging technological details of Linux.

a silly question:

> +#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
> +
> +/*
> + * Allocate the thread_group_cputime structure appropriately for UP kernels
> + * and fill in the current values of the fields. Called from copy_signal()
> + * via thread_group_cputime_clone_thread() when adding a second or subsequent
> + * thread to a thread group. Assumes interrupts are enabled when called.
> + */
> +int thread_group_cputime_alloc(struct task_struct *tsk)
> +{

why is there _any_ assymetry needed between UP and SMP? These days we
just write straight code for SMP, and UP is just a single-CPU
special-case of it. _Sometimes_ if it's really worth it we do some UP
special cases but it's the exception, not the rule.

Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/