Re: No NONBLOCK flag for dup3() or epoll_create1()?

[Michael Kerrisk]

Ping!

On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 6:49 PM, Michael Kerrisk
<mtk.manpages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Ulrich
>
> I've been doing some testing (2.6.27-rc3) of your new
> file-descriptor-creating syscalls that accept flags.  According to
>
> http://udrepper.livejournal.com/20407.html
>
> all of the system calls should accept a *_NONBLOCK flag.  All of them do,
> except for two:
> dup3(olfd, newfd, flags)
> and
> epoll_create1(flags).
>
> For epoll_create1() this certainly appears to be an oversight, since I can't
> think of a reason not to support *_NONBLOCK.
>
> For dup3() it is perhaps also an oversight.  However, it's not really clear
> to me whether supporting O_NONBLOCK makes sense, since that would change the
> file status flags of the open file description that is (also) referred to by
> oldfd.  (Furthermore, given a open file description for which O_NONBLOCK is
> already enabled, it is not possible to make a dup3() call that disables
> O_NONBLOCK, which is an odd asymmetry in the API.)  What are your thoughts
> on
> this?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Michael
>
>



-- 
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
man-pages online: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online_pages.html
Found a bug? http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/reporting_bugs.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/