Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default

[Alan Cox]

> And I'm not really interested. Quite frankly, I suspect the "we want to 
> run something like pulseaudio with RT priorities" camp is the more common 
> one, and in that context I understand limiting SCHED_FIFO sounds perfectly 
> understandable.

Is there actually a reason we can't have two forms of SCHED_FIFO. For
hard RT the existing behaviour is a lot more useful and it is hard to see
how you'd emulate it.

> quite frankly, most programmers aren't "supposedly bad". And if you think 
> that the hard-RT "real man" programmers aren't bad, I really have nothing 
> to say.

"real man" programmers stare at the code in Zen contemplation and debug
by powercycling - thats one thing even hard RT processes can't beat.

Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/