Re: [PATCH 6/6] sched: disabled rt-bandwidth by default

[Mark Hounschell]

Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > I've always thought that the policy settings belong in the distro, and the 
> > kernel should never enforce a policy (by setting this as default, it is 
> > enforcing a policy, even though an RT user can change it).
>
> The kernel has always done a certain amount of "default policy". 
>
> What do you think things like "swappiness" etc are? Or things like 
> oevrcommit settings? They're all policies, and there is always a default 
> one. So in that sense the kernel always has - and fundamentally _must_ - 
> set some kind of policy.
>
> And the default policy should generally be the one that makes sense for 
> most people. Quite frankly, if it's an issue where all normal distros 
> would basically be expected to set a value, then that value should _be_ 
> the default policy, and none of the normal distros should ever need to 
> worry.
>
> Whether this case is one such, I dunno. Quite frankly, I don't think it's 
> even _nearly_ important enough to get this kind of noise.
>
> 		Linus

More and more are wanting and now finding the Linux kernel to be more
RT capable. I seem to remember way back you saying it was one thing 
you didn't really care much about one way or the other. Thats OK. But, 
you _are_ the man. Put an end to this. Are you going to allow the long
understood meaning of SCHED_FIFO to change in the Linux kernel 
just to protect a few _supposedly_ bad programmers???

Regards
Mark

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/