Re: [PATCH] printk timestamp post-boot suppression, v2

[Ingo Molnar]

* Joe Korty <joe.korty@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:16:30PM -0400, Mark Brown wrote:
> > It'd be nicer if this were optional - syslog typically only logs at
> > second resolution and not all systems are going to have logfiles.
> 
> Optionally suppress printk timestamping after system boot.

i think the best approach is to write an initcall tracer - i think Arjan 
has some ideas in that area.

that would be infinitely higher quality than anything printk based 
anyway, as with ftrace you could see the reasons of why a boot delay 
happens - which tasks context-switch, in which code path, etc.

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/