Re: loaded router, excessive getnstimeofday in oprofile

[Jarek Poplawski]

Stephen Hemminger wrote, On 08/27/2008 06:17 PM:

> On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 14:54:12 +0200
> Andi Kleen <andi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>> Yup, this innocent toys can end up with this such behaviour on modern
>>> highly loaded machines.
>> I and also other people had some patches to move the time stamp
>> measuring into the socket. This way the time stamping didn't need to
>> be enabled on all packets, only on those that actually end up at a
>> socket that requires the time stamp.
>>
>> Unfortunately DaveM didn't like it because some bank wanted
>> different semantics, see the discussion in 
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/91679
>>
>> Perhaps you can find out which bank it was and send them a bill for
>> your CPU time ;-)
>>
>> -Andi
>>
> 
> Look at /proc/net/ptype to see if any AF_PACKET sockets are open.
> There are several causes of this:
>    * Applications like DHCP use AF_PACKET when they could use something else
>    * AF_PACKET API was poorly designed and always has timestamps
>    * The choice was made to get more accurate timestamps by stamping early in
>      receive code. A better alternative would be to do it in protocol handler
>      after the socket filter. Sorry, Andi socket layer is too late.
>    * No driver is using hardware mechanisms to get accurate/free timestamps.
>      I was working on sky2, but never was stable/complete.
> 
> Easist advice now is to fix userspace.

And what is working advice?

Why exactly admin can't chose between 2 alternatives here?

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/