Re: [PATCH 2/2] Add support for > 2GiB MTD devices

[Artem Bityutskiy]

Hi Bruce,

On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 14:27 -0700, Bruce Leonard wrote:
> +/*
> + * Inline function for determining the size of the MTD device, independant
> + * of old or new way of doing things.
> + *
> + */
> +static inline u_int64_t device_size(struct mtd_info *a)
> +{
> +	return a->num_eraseblocks == 0 ? a->size : a->num_eraseblocks * a->erasesize;
> +}

I do not think it is a good idea to do multiplication every time we need
MTD device size. It is unnecessarily large overhead in terms of speed
and code size.

Did you consider a possibility of just making mtd->size 64 bit?
Or using eraseblock:offset pairs instead of absolute address?

-- 
Best regards,
Artem Bityutskiy (ÐÐÑÑÑÐÐÐ ÐÑÑÑÐ)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/